PJS: New deal could help quench thirsty budget
This is just the sort of forward thinking, investigative article I’ve
come to expect from veteran JS reporter Elaine Hopkins. She had some
questions: How much money does District 150 get from its soda vendor
contracts, how much is it per student and how does it compare to other
districts. Then, she answered it:
The district, with more than 15,000 students and 3,000 employees,
receives only about $120,000 a year in profits and donations from
vending machine companies, shows an examination of records acquired
through the Freedom of Information Act.
Rather than bidding out a districtwide contract, individual school
principals and building operators negotiate their own arrangements
with vendors. Collectively, they bring in about $8 per student.
Other districts that bid vending contracts make much more per
student than District 150.
Pekin High School, with an enrollment of about 2,100 students, bid a
vending contract that nets about $100,000 yearly. The money, about
$48 per student, is earmarked for technology and other purposes.
Rockford District 205, with 28,300 students, has a 10-year, $7.5
million contract with Coca-Cola, said Pete Keffer, director of
finance. That averages out to about $26 per student annually.
District 150’s longtime practice of allowing each school and
building to arrange for vending machines makes it difficult to trace
records on those transactions, and the funds are not subject to
outside audits. Documents obtained through the FOI Act, for example,
do not reveal how much the vending companies receive from the
machines or how the proceeds to the schools are computed.
People need to realize just how much hard work goes into gathering the
information for a story like this. If I know District 150, the probably
dragged their heels through the entire FOIA process and did its best to
find reasons to not release the information.
NOTE: The fact that any government needs a Freedom of Information Act is
an obscenity. When a member of the public wants to see a public
document, the government needs to hand over a copy of the document -
minus a reasonable duplication fee — no questions asked. Failure to do
so should be grounds for immediate termination.
Putting the journalism of the article aside, I have problems with soda
machines in schools. I’m a diabetic. I used to drink nothing but
straight Coke, and I’m sure that having soda machines in the hallways at
school would have aggravated the problem I have now. I’ve substitute
taught in schools that do have have soda machines. The kids drink them
in class.
I’m just not comfortable pimping the future health of children in order
to keep school boards, teachers unions and taxpayers from facing
uncomfortable truths about spending and taxes. If money was the only
consideration here, the cheerleaders might as well be selling lap dances
at basketball games.
And remember, the money kids spend on sodas in class is money they won’t
be spending at the corner store on the way home from school. That means
less money for privately owned merchants, and less sales tax revenue.
There is no such thing as free money.
The district would be better off getting a handle on administrative
costs. And, it’s time for the City of Peoria to start finding wayt to
help — not hinder — District 150 schools.
Note: This post was retrieved from Google’s cashe. Original comments are
missing.