Verbatim: Jerry Smith, Journal Star online editor
On a whim, I thought I’d see if Jerry Smith (right), the online editor at the Peoria Journal Star, would agree to answer a few email questions about his job and the future of online journalism. I wouldn’t have blamed him had he declined. After all, reporters are sometimes hesitant to put themselves under microscope. And I have, on occasion, laid some heavy criticism on his newspaper, his bosses and the Web site itself. But Mr. Smith came through like a trooper:
Peoria Pundit: Jerry, can you tell our readers what your job as “online editor” at the Journal Star entails?
Jerry Smith: Basically, I am in charge of all the editorial content on pjstar.com. That includes all of the stories, photos, online special sections, Web logs and multimedia produced by our Web team and newsroom. I oversee all of the comments our readers submit, and all of the questions they ask about our site. I also assist the newsroom, particularly the sports department, with technical matters.
Today, I have a staff of 3 1/2 people who are learning a new system on the new site. We have been publishing 65-120 stories a day for years. Now we are doing it 18 hours a day.
PP: As you mentioned in your article, pjstar.com started with little fanfare and originally was just a collection of links. Today, there’s a ton of content. In your opinion, how important has the Web become in the delivery of news, both locally and elsewhere?
JS: Some might say I drank the corporate Kool-aid, but I think Web-first publishing is going to be a very good thing for the Journal Star and the newspaper business. The Web is literally transforming the way we deliver news, much like cable changed the TV industry. Today, the Journal Star has begun allowing readers to read what we know, when we know it, with frequent updates. We will occasionally hold an enterprise story until after the 10 p.m. news, but that is the exception now, not the rule. A year ago, as you know, it was the rule, not the exception.
The next year is going to be very interesting for our newsroom, to say the least.
PP: Most people seems pleased with the new design. But the fact is that it’s more than a redesign. Can you tell us about Zope and how it is supposed to give readers a better experience online?
JS: I am not a Zope expert, so I can’t say Zope4Media is better than any other content management system. But I can say I am pleased with how well pjstar.com is running already. Honestly, though, anything would have been better than what we were using before Tuesday when GateHouse flipped the switch to its system.
What you are seeing on pjstar.com right now is rather minimalistic, partly out of necessity. Many of the features we long for are still to come. Ultimately, GateHouse wants us to publish our newspaper from our Web site.
Our previous system hadn’t been designed for that kind of dynamic publishing. It was built so that one man could publish upwards of 120 stories on any given day with as little intervention as possible. We pushed the envelope of that system well beyond what we ever intended to do.
Zope should take us well into the future. Although stories will be listed on pjstar.com for a week or two, we have been told, once a story is published, it will remain online.
PP: Any media that operates a Web site has to cope with the question of whether to allow input from the public in the form of comments, and if so, to what degree and what sorts of comments should be allowed? Can you tell us what the Journal Star’s policy is regarding moderation reader comments, and maybe a few examples?
JS: I am fond of the current “Pool Rules” listed below every story. Although I didn’t write these specifically, the pool rules are simple and to the point and basically summarize the policy I have followed since we introduced comments on our site nearly two years ago.
* Keep it clean.
* Stay on topic.
* Be honest and accurate.
* No personal attacks.
* Don’t say anything here you wouldn’t say in front of your mother at the dinner table.
* Use the ‘Report Abuse’ button when you spot a rule violation.
It is very clear to me that our stories produce a lot of emotion. Then, after reading a story, an anonymous reader is offered the chance to sound off. And so they do. The results frequently are outrageous.
I am going to avoid specific examples, but moderating the “honest and accurate” comments is most difficult. I used the quotations because a reader may truly believe they are being honest and accurate, but I have to ask, what is honest and accurate in an anonymous world?
The Journal Star, like all newspapers, almost never publishes information gleaned from anonymous sources. When we do, we will go to great lengths to verify the information, and then weigh the importance of providing it. With comments, we almost never have time to verify the new “facts,” so we instead delete them, or simply disable comments altogether.
PP: I noticed that, at least for now, the blogs operated by PJS staffers seem to be using the old design. When will they be moved to Zope? And is there any chance the pjstar.com will link to other bloggers in the community, as they do at the State Journal-Register, a fellow GateHouse Media newspaper?
JS: The old design on our blogs is just temporary. I am very close to completing new templates that will make our blogs look like the rest of the Web site. Unfortunately, I couldn’t lock down that design before we switched to Zope, but we will roll it out soon.
GateHouse has no plans to host blogs on Zope for security reasons. So our blogs are going to be hosted at the Journal Star for the foreseeable future. Although the blogs at other GateHouse Web sites, such as rrstar.com, look like the rest of the Web site, it is merely cosmetic; most of GateHouse blogs are hosted by WordPress. That alternative is available to us, but several of our bloggers have been blogging for more than two years and we really don’t want to lose the data they have developed if we can avoid it.
GateHouse has had plans for developing user-generated content, such as blogs, from the beginning. Rockford already is hosting community bloggers, and I expect we will do the same in the future. We don’t have a timetable for introducing this on pjstar.com.
May 25th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
Very cool, interesting article. Good job to the both of you. Does this mean that you’ll be laying off the PJStar now, at least for awhile?
May 25th, 2008 at 8:34 pm
No, don’t lay off. It’s good for watchdogs to have watchdogs.
May 26th, 2008 at 9:27 am
I have to take issue with the “honest and accurate” decisions. I’m not sure why anyone should try to judge that aspect of an editorial comment to the point of deleting it entirely. I don’t think any of my comments have been deleted for this but I did have one edited some time ago and it completely changed the tone of my comment. Unless it is a personal attack or profane, I see no reason to judge the veracity of comments … let those in the discussion fend for themselves.
May 26th, 2008 at 10:58 am
The Journal Star does not edit comments. The Journal Star deletes comments. If you really think your comment has been edited, send me an email and let me know. I will repeat: the Journal Star does not edit comments.
May 26th, 2008 at 11:28 am
Unfortunately, not true of the letters to the editor in the print version.
May 26th, 2008 at 11:44 am
Nice job Bily and Jerry. I’ve always thought Jerry to be judicious in his decisions to disable or interject.
May 26th, 2008 at 11:54 am
My apologies Jerry … I was not precise. It was a letter to the editor sent via email. And it was at least a year or more ago. Also that wasn’t a personal jab or anything … just my opinion.
Actually I would prefer the entire deletion to editing and leaving my name on something, that by omission or change of some words (or entire paragraphs), is no longer what I wrote.
May 26th, 2008 at 11:58 am
Allow ME to be more precise. There is a limited amount of space on a printed page. Hence, the need to edit. Which is, come to think of it, YET another reason online is superior to using dead trees and soy byproduct to engage in journalism in the 21st century.
May 26th, 2008 at 12:02 pm
Anonymous comments can be hateful at times and I think Jerry Smith does an outstanding job of moderating them. It must be trying when stories about the South Side or East Bluff bring all the racists out of the woodwork. Requiring registration could curtail some of the drive-by hateful comments. Some of those yahoos couldn’t be bothered with taking a few minutes to select a user name, register, and wait for email confirmation with an activation link.
May 26th, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Some of the racist comments are of the drive-by variety. But sometimes, I think these people are organized.
May 26th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
Billy Dennis said “Allow ME to be more precise. There is a limited amount of space on a printed page. Hence, the need to edit.”
OMG hell is freezing over. Billy is defending the PJStar.
May 26th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I’ve been looking for 4 days on the new PJS for an email address to send friendly complaints to, but haven’t found one. I just counted 6 large blinking, blaring, ads on the front page of the site. How many ads are on the front page of the printed version? None. I understand the only reason for a newspaper to have a web version is to make money, but this is a bit too much for me. Local news should be highlighted, as it was on the old version. The new version looks exactly like a thousand other web sites, with basically the same layout and lack of focus. I want the local news, not a commercial from the good folks in Burlington, IA.
May 27th, 2008 at 12:33 am
I will work on that contact link. In the interim, my email is jsmith(at)pjstar.com