Comments on: Breaking news: We have the right to bear arms

By: mcsey

mcsey — Sat, 28 Jun 2008 12:47:46 +0000

Cheer up gun control advocates. This decision did two things:

1) Overturn DC (and eventually Chicago’s) outright ban on guns.
2) Bless most all other existing gun control laws.

Make gun control laws that aren’t bans.

By: vonster

vonster — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:51:25 +0000

Sorry I misunderstood you, Beej. So you DO want traffic laws just as long as they don’t get enforced on you. Got it.

By: BlargenBlog » Blog Archive » Rant Salad - 6/27/2008

BlargenBlog » Blog Archive » Rant Salad - 6/27/2008 — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 14:44:47 +0000

[...] Dennis posted a blog about the SC(r)OTUS decision to overturn the Washington DC handgun ban, a decision I support. [...]

By: BJ Stone

BJ Stone — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:55:18 +0000

Excellent (and sensible) points made there Louis. But you won’t win over this crowd.

Digger: Yep, saw that. Like I said, I’ve never been in favor of “gun control” the way the NRA fear mongers would have you believe we’re trying to get, but I am in favor of sensible restrictions on ownership, and what types of weapons can be owned.

Vonster: Wrong again, and you know that. I want traffic laws, as a matter of fact I want a lot of them that already exist to simply be enforced. I just don’t like the laziness and money-making greediness of officers just sitting in medians and on overpasses cherry picking speeders. For instance, the Illinois State Police have a big push on “100% compliance” with seat belt laws. Tell you what, ISP, when you get “100% compliance” on turn signal usage, not running stop signs or red lights, and dimming your lights to oncoming traffic, THEN and ONLY THEN should you worry about “100% compliance” on seat belts.

But back to the topic at hand…

Rick: What?!?!

By: Louis Howe

Louis Howe — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 02:12:47 +0000

Honestly, I don’ have a problem with people wanting to own guns. However, there is something intellectually dishonest when gun owners claim to be safer in their homes because they have a gun. The statistics overwhelming demonstrate that gun owners are many times more likely to use a weapon on themselves or another family member then repel some criminal intruder. Just last month I attended two funerals in the same week for friends who committed suicide with a hand gun. One fellow was a politically active NRA member who awoke one morning, rolled out of bed, and shot himself. There are few second chances when using a gun at close range. Everybody thinks getting depressed won’t happen to them. It would be interesting to know the suicide success rate for NRA members vs the general public.

By: Rick A Hyatt

Rick A Hyatt — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:40:20 +0000

OH, THIS IS NOTHING! Next Step? Will be when I am subpeona’d for my testimony on my past 30+ years as an US Army “Manchurian Candidate Study” subject.
(Go to http://www.rickhyatt.freeservers.com to see just how immersed I AM in this espionage business - Hope you have Piclens, for I’ve got PHOTOS of past major spies I have known long-term along this line you won’t believe!)
That is to say, my own mission as a “Sleeper,” totally controlled, of course, by the FBI and (Double-Blind, unknowingly) “Social(ist) Services,” was to “Act up” (Utilizing special psychological and physical attributes such as clinical hypnosis and Celiac’s Disease, which causes reversible neopathy) to the degree that I became “One of those who shouldn’t own a gun… and thusly influence on-going anti-gun legislation. I was successful in helping Maui Waiver Form 2036 (Allowing the corrupt politicians to search a gun applicant’s ENTIRE LIFE’S medical, sexual etc. files) and then exploit same for political purposes on Maui. Coming then here to Wyoming, hearing of my “Reputation” they specially whipped up our Concealed Carry Permit Restriction, for such “ a person like me… Then, when I passed the NCIC, etc., and got a Florida Permit, valid here, they passed a special law - JUST FOR ME- ILLEGAL AS HELL - Such that it could not be used here, as examples.
My “Behavioral Programming?” To act unnaturally conservative, pro-Constitutional, openly Patriotic, and to be vocal about it. Be “Dumbed Down” from the Celiac’s by eating bread and drinking beer. Couldn’t have made a better target and/or “Dummy” for the Liberals to use as an “Example.”
Now… Since so many anti-gun laws are based on the acts of the Columbine, Post Office, Mall otherwise-untraceable (By the APA, anyway) “Sleepers” (As myself), then how can ANY OF THOSE LAWS BE VALID AT ALL?

“Telling the truth during times of universal deceit will be a revolutionary act.” George Orwell, “1984″

By: Digger

Digger — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:04:37 +0000

BJ: The court did not say certain restrictions cannot be made on gun possession.

By: vonster

vonster — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:03:31 +0000

But BJ doesn;t want traffic laws………

By: vonster

vonster — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:02:50 +0000

BJ: What rifle has a 324 round clip? I want one!

By: Sam Bush

Sam Bush — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:30:05 +0000

Some stupid-assed news hen on the radio this morning was wondering whether the big drop in the stock market was caused by the Supreme Court decision. DUH!!!