Come on, get real PC. Those words are as empty and hollow as the rest of his campaign. The more you argue the weaker your position seems to get. It scares me that there are voters like you that equate that to substance.

“The bad news is that voters who had been voting Republican, along with many life-long Republicans, were revolted by what they saw as Congressional Republicans’ betrayal of core principles with massive overspending, no new ideas, stagnation and corruption.”

These are directly from the site and I consider the text the same as if Aaron spoke these words to a gathering of voters.
When someone puts words to a paper, phyical or electronic, it is their ideas and we as readers of those words can count on these writings as being true to the authors thinking.
I some person writes something down for you to speak to a crowd of record in a text by the fact that you do it gives authority to the words as from your own intellect.
If you don’t agree then you do not speak or let them be printed under your own name.

I just did, obviously you haven’t. No where in there does it cite ONE instance of him standing up to the Republican powers that be. It’s more Steve Shearer meaningless drivel that makes you want to gauge your eyes out by the type you make it through the overly wordy and yet meaningless paragraphs.

I suggest you read it again and go back to your kool-aid drinking bullet points and find a better example.

“One other item, Aaron critcized the change in the elected members over time by way of the lack of support for the ideals that were once in play during the Republican control era.” = BS

Cite an example, you can’t. Not that I am wholly opposed to most of the Republican agenda, because I am not. But Schock is anything but a shining example of individuality.