<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Politics: Modern Whig interview gets attention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/26/politics-modern-whig-interview-gets-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/26/politics-modern-whig-interview-gets-attention/</link>
	<description>News and Media from River City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:35:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/26/politics-modern-whig-interview-gets-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-3439</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 01:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=580#comment-3439</guid>
		<description>Thanks for quoting my article!

I write for Independent Political Report, but agree with a lot of what you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for quoting my article!</p>
<p>I write for Independent Political Report, but agree with a lot of what you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rog</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/26/politics-modern-whig-interview-gets-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-3404</link>
		<dc:creator>Rog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=580#comment-3404</guid>
		<description>The issue that McGee is failing to realize is that the Whigs are circumventing the ballot access issue by combining their strategy and tactics with their idea of starting with a winning track record by running Whigs on major party tickets. The Whigs seem to get it that the majority of average Joes and Janes won&#039;t be checking the name of a candidate that isn&#039;t next to a D or an R. Change often comes from within.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue that McGee is failing to realize is that the Whigs are circumventing the ballot access issue by combining their strategy and tactics with their idea of starting with a winning track record by running Whigs on major party tickets. The Whigs seem to get it that the majority of average Joes and Janes won&#8217;t be checking the name of a candidate that isn&#8217;t next to a D or an R. Change often comes from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eyebrows McGee</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/26/politics-modern-whig-interview-gets-attention/comment-page-1/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>Eyebrows McGee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=580#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>Given the Greens&#039; success in Europe, Aus/NZ, and parts of Canada (as well as in local elections in the US), including experience in governing coalitions, I don&#039;t think it&#039;s non-viable as a third party -- I would suggest the problem in the US is a ballot-access issue, which is exactly the same problem with Whigs will face.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the Greens&#8217; success in Europe, Aus/NZ, and parts of Canada (as well as in local elections in the US), including experience in governing coalitions, I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s non-viable as a third party &#8212; I would suggest the problem in the US is a ballot-access issue, which is exactly the same problem with Whigs will face.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
