<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media: GateHouse sells off two newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/</link>
	<description>News and Media from River City</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 16:35:40 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookworm</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4639</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4639</guid>
		<description>If GateHouse DID improve the morale and benefits at the Times-Observer, the previous management must have REALLY sucked. 

I suspect as much because I did attempt to apply for a job there once (pre-Gatehouse), and was immediately turned off by a number of things, particularly their &quot;no-compete&quot; clause forbidding ANYONE who worked for them from working for ANY other newspaper within a 50-mile radius for 6 months after they quit. They actually attempted to enforce this clause (which is designed for high-profile print columnists, TV anchors, etc.) against people like barely-above-minimum-wage ad reps who quit to work for other area newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If GateHouse DID improve the morale and benefits at the Times-Observer, the previous management must have REALLY sucked. </p>
<p>I suspect as much because I did attempt to apply for a job there once (pre-Gatehouse), and was immediately turned off by a number of things, particularly their &#8220;no-compete&#8221; clause forbidding ANYONE who worked for them from working for ANY other newspaper within a 50-mile radius for 6 months after they quit. They actually attempted to enforce this clause (which is designed for high-profile print columnists, TV anchors, etc.) against people like barely-above-minimum-wage ad reps who quit to work for other area newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4633</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4633</guid>
		<description>Dewayne

I work for a Gatehouse paper they bought two years ago.

NO raise since they bought  it.
Benefits about the same.
They laid off 20 people when they bought us.
Left in place incompetent and harassing managers.
They&#039;re JUST LIKE JRC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dewayne</p>
<p>I work for a Gatehouse paper they bought two years ago.</p>
<p>NO raise since they bought  it.<br />
Benefits about the same.<br />
They laid off 20 people when they bought us.<br />
Left in place incompetent and harassing managers.<br />
They&#8217;re JUST LIKE JRC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgiselle12</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4327</link>
		<dc:creator>cgiselle12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4327</guid>
		<description>maybe in reducing their own bloat, from over-buying, Gatehouse can focus on being a good newspaper company? I actually like the changes made to the Times Observer, too, the website et al. It&#039;s good stuff. PJS has a vastly improved website as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe in reducing their own bloat, from over-buying, Gatehouse can focus on being a good newspaper company? I actually like the changes made to the Times Observer, too, the website et al. It&#8217;s good stuff. PJS has a vastly improved website as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peo Proud</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4324</link>
		<dc:creator>Peo Proud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4324</guid>
		<description>DeWayne,

Thanks for sharing the insiders perspective - always good to know there are two sides of an issue.  Hope they make it through the current difficulties in a manner that enables them to continue strengthening your weekly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DeWayne,</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing the insiders perspective &#8211; always good to know there are two sides of an issue.  Hope they make it through the current difficulties in a manner that enables them to continue strengthening your weekly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dewayne</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator>dewayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 13:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4322</guid>
		<description>I have to call you on this one Bill. 
There have been no staff reductions at Times Newspapers. 
We were lean before GateHouse bought us. 
And, as a personal aside, I like life under GateHouse.
They let us start our sports section. 
They brought back columns.
They gave each paper a Web site.
They encouraged us to start blogs. 
The benefits even improved.
They have made a considerable investment in technology here. 
The morale around here is very high.   
Gatehouse has been very good to Times Newspapers. 
We are treated well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to call you on this one Bill.<br />
There have been no staff reductions at Times Newspapers.<br />
We were lean before GateHouse bought us.<br />
And, as a personal aside, I like life under GateHouse.<br />
They let us start our sports section.<br />
They brought back columns.<br />
They gave each paper a Web site.<br />
They encouraged us to start blogs.<br />
The benefits even improved.<br />
They have made a considerable investment in technology here.<br />
The morale around here is very high.<br />
Gatehouse has been very good to Times Newspapers.<br />
We are treated well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Correction</title>
		<link>http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/2008/08/28/media-gatehouse-sells-off-two-newspapers/comment-page-1/#comment-4316</link>
		<dc:creator>Correction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pundit.blogpeoria.com/?p=3620#comment-4316</guid>
		<description>Who says the Pekin Daily Times has faced reductions? It is not true. Not a single newsroom position has been cut in many years. Not one. I think the last cut was made about ... oh, six years ago? When one person left her position was not filled again. The PDT was never overstaffed in the first place, as so many others were.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says the Pekin Daily Times has faced reductions? It is not true. Not a single newsroom position has been cut in many years. Not one. I think the last cut was made about &#8230; oh, six years ago? When one person left her position was not filled again. The PDT was never overstaffed in the first place, as so many others were.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
